Hello Elias, thanks for feedback. Feel free to share the finnish document, google translate makes this no longer a problem.
-- With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, http://dataved.ru/ +7 916 562 8095 On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Elias Aarnio <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > 07.04.2013 22:33, Alexei Fedotov kirjoitti: > > >> Elias, thanks for digging this up. BTW, where do you think is the best >> part of Adobe Connect to learn from? >> >> Alexei, > > I interpret your question as "what makes Adobe Connect more tempting". > > If this is the question the answer is: > > * Connect has a sleek design that is convincing especially from > non-technical person's view. This is hard to accomplish in an Open Source > project like OM that contains different parts with different designs. > However, there are some simple things we could do. Example: instructions on > how to make browser automatically open the jnlp-executable downloaded. Sad > as it is - this could be a dealbreaker for an organization. > > * Connect has the ability of splitting the meeting in to subgroups who may > work independently and then come back to main meeting. (example: a meeting > splitting into subgroups) This is valued by people who mainly use the sw > for meetings. > > There is a conferencing software comparison done by a Finnish education > organization about 2 years ago. It is of course in Finnish but I can read > it through again and check it against the roadmap of OM. > > I am afraid that I am useless when it comes to coding as I have not done > it years. I do have experience about FLOSS in both corporate and > educational use. > > -- > Elias Aarnio > >
