It could work that getting src and samples from https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/tree/master/jdk-1.6-parent/whiteboard-parent, right? Or should i test it in OM3.0?
2013/11/22 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>: > I'm afraid you can try WB but without OM :( > It make possible to draw, but unfortunately there is no code written to use > it with OM :( > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 12:14 PM, 小野圭二 <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Thanks, i am going to try new WB on my OM. >> Keep doing nice work. :-) >> >> 2013/11/22 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>: >> > Actually only room and video is swf in 3.0 >> > We plan to have only swf video in 3.1 >> > No swf in 3.x :))) >> > >> > WB example should work out of the box, please report any issues with it >> > to >> > this list :) >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 12:06 PM, 小野圭二 <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Quick response, wow. >> >> >> >> It seems like OpenMeetings is still swf, but just WB will be HTML5, >> >> right? >> >> Then may be over ver.3.x will be all HTML5, but it will not near >> >> future, will it? >> >> >> >> I wonder the new WB works if it just implement into webapps path. >> >> If so, i am able to test it easily. >> >> >> >> 2013/11/22 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>: >> >> > Good question :) >> >> > >> >> > I was hoping to release 3.0.0 a month ago >> >> > currently I hope we will be able to release it late December/early >> >> > January >> >> > (depends on our progress with red5 stability) >> >> > Right after 3.0.0 release we will made trunk 3.1 and will start to >> >> > convert >> >> > the room :) >> >> > Actually you can try new WB: >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/tree/master/jdk-1.6-parent/whiteboard-parent >> >> > You will need to compile examples ... >> >> > >> >> > Any contributions are welcome :) >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:46 AM, 小野圭二 <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> I am very interested in ver.3.1. >> >> >> Could you tell me the time table? >> >> >> And what can i do for that? >> >> >> >> >> >> -Ono >> >> >> >> >> >> 2013/11/22 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>: >> >> >> > We have no code specific to mouse/penpad. >> >> >> > I'll try to reproduce your issue, but bot sure we can do anything >> >> >> > to >> >> >> > resolve >> >> >> > it until 3.1 :( >> >> >> > Unfortunately framework current WB implementation is based on is >> >> >> > not >> >> >> > supported for 2+ years. >> >> >> > in 3.1 we will move WB to HTML5 and this should resolve such >> >> >> > issues >> >> >> > (I >> >> >> > believe so) >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:09 AM, Sergey <[email protected]> >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hello! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I think that's how they work with flash. I haven't got such a >> >> >> >> big >> >> >> >> delay, >> >> >> >> but I have similiar problem with my penpad. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Sergey. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 21.11.2013 22:32, "Mathias Bässler" пишет: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Hello everyone, >> >> >> >>> if I use a penpad or a touchpad (tried different ones) I >> >> >> >>> noticed >> >> >> >>> a >> >> >> >>> delay in the whiteboard while drawing etc. which isn't occuring >> >> >> >>> with >> >> >> >>> the >> >> >> >>> mouse. >> >> >> >>> If I put the pen on the pad, I have to wait like a second before >> >> >> >>> I >> >> >> >>> can >> >> >> >>> draw, if I start immediately some of the line is missing. >> >> >> >>> Is the mouse treated differently or why is this happening and is >> >> >> >>> there >> >> >> >>> something I can do to solve this? >> >> >> >>> Greetings, >> >> >> >>> Mathias >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > -- >> >> >> > WBR >> >> >> > Maxim aka solomax >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > WBR >> >> > Maxim aka solomax >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > WBR >> > Maxim aka solomax > > > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax
