We accepting documentation contributions ;) On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Daria Mikhaylova <[email protected]> wrote:
> Wow thank you, Maxim, it's exactly what we were looking for and searching > how to do it. > Seems in new documentation there is no mention of this possibility, but > now I've found it. > Thanks again for help! > daria > > On 2/11/2015 09:46, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > > Unfortunately network is the bottleneck for video conferences > One can play with parameters in config.xml to decrease video quality and > reduce bandwidth per user > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Daria Mikhaylova <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> Good morning! >> So we are going quite well, we have virtual server 2-core 2GB RAM (VPS >> digital ocean) >> and for now maximum we did conference with 6 participants and smallest >> video, 4 of them were in Italy, where internet connection is really really >> bad. >> >> On 2/11/2015 09:19, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >> >> Here is the message: http://markmail.org/message/k7pwhdn2vdbzkgmy (you >> can try to use google translate) >> >> here are the highlights: >> 0) they have bad performance with CentOS 6.5 VM >> so they got >> 1) physical server HP DL380 G5 with 4GB RAM and 2x 4-core CPU Intel Xeon >> X5450 >> (3 ГГц). Gigabit Ethernet >> 2) CentOS 6.6 Final x64 >> 3) OM 3.0.4-SNAPSHOT with all dependencies and third-party tools >> >> as a result: >> 1) CPU was loaded up to 55% >> 2) Outgoing network utilization on server was 71 Mbit/sec >> 3) 15 participants were on network with bandwidth 50 Mbit/sec and it was >> totally utilized >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 6:04 AM, OpenAr-IT Soluciones <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> Hi Maxim, do you know how the Russian team tunned the server?, do you >>> have the configuration parameters they used? >>> >>> >>> Thanks in advance >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks! will ask >>>> >>>> Actually we have report in Russian mailing list about successful >>>> conference with 18 video windows: >>>> 16 with video 240х180 and 2 with 640х480. >>>> They have tuned both server and network >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Daria Mikhaylova < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I will try next time, we chose this video format only because were >>>>> not sure if server can hold 5 of us. >>>>> Yes CPU usage was high, my laptop is i3-2367M @1.40 Ghz, RAM 8 64bit >>>>> but when testing OM, I've shut down all applications to see "pure" >>>>> result. >>>>> >>>>> great! if any day you need additional testers we'll be happy to help >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 2/10/2015 22:27, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I saw issues with 90x120 video on Mac, can you increase the size a >>>>> bit? (select next larger option) >>>>> According to delay on Windows: was was CPU usage? >>>>> We are actually starting to test audio/video and recording tomorrow >>>>> morning (Development is performed using Ubuntu machine so I see no issues >>>>> :( ) >>>>> Will try to reproduce your results tomorrow morning >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Daria Mikhaylova < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, Maxim, >>>>>> >>>>>> We've tested with 3 users and large video (640x480) with our server >>>>>> and demo-server. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ubuntu Studio preemptive kernel 14.04 with Chrome >>>>>> Windows 7 with Chrome/Firefox >>>>>> 10.9.5 Mac OS Chrome/Firefox >>>>>> >>>>>> Results are: >>>>>> for Ubuntu Chrome doesn't create any problem. >>>>>> for Mac OS same, when entered with Chrome sound went a little low for >>>>>> both of us. >>>>>> for Windows Chrome creates delay of 6-8 sec and sound goes very bad, >>>>>> instead Firefox doesn't give any problem, real-time. >>>>>> >>>>>> On your server is exactly the same. 8 sec delay for windows with >>>>>> Chrome. >>>>>> >>>>>> Last time 2 of our other participants were using Mac OS with chrome >>>>>> and couldn't activate video (in conference total 5 users: 4 video >>>>>> 90x120, 1 >>>>>> audio) and sound was disappearing to one or to other. When I asked one of >>>>>> them to test later with firefox it was working, chrome still was giving >>>>>> same error. >>>>>> >>>>>> Hope it can give you some meaningful information, >>>>>> thank you again, >>>>>> daria >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2/10/2015 15:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks a lot, we have 3.0.4RC1 (installed there) >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Daria Mikhaylova < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> OM 3.0.3 >>>>>>> I will try on demo server today when I'll get testers together and >>>>>>> write you back. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2/10/2015 15:02, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What version of OM are you using? >>>>>>> Cant you check if the problem reproducible on our demo server? >>>>>>> http://om.alteametasoft.com:5080/openmeetings >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Daria Mikhaylova < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thank you Maxim for looking into it, if for you works fine, >>>>>>>> probably there is other reason than chrome. >>>>>>>> Yesterday I was also trying to use Chrome (from Windows) to >>>>>>>> participate in OM with 5 other people and it was causing problems to >>>>>>>> everyone - people were not hearing each other, room was getting >>>>>>>> stacked, as >>>>>>>> soon I've changed to firefox, there was no problem anymore. >>>>>>>> Unfortunatelly I cannot provide specific steps - the only thing I >>>>>>>> am sure, it was not problem of my internet connection and also our >>>>>>>> server >>>>>>>> was stable (droplet 20$). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am not expert in video/audio conferencing, is it true that if one >>>>>>>> person has problem with bandwidth - everyone in the room suffer? >>>>>>>> eventually >>>>>>>> if there is any setting that permit us to isolate one with problems so >>>>>>>> others are not touched? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> thank you again! >>>>>>>> daria >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2/10/2015 09:37, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Just have tried >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Google Chrome 40.0.2214.111 (64-bit) >>>>>>>> Mac OS X 10.9.5 (iMac) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> conference room works as expected >>>>>>>> Maybe there are any specific steps to reproduce? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Daria Mikhaylova < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> Seems that last version of google chrome 40.0.2214.111 installed >>>>>>>>> on Mac (3 different computers) gives strange problem for users of OM, >>>>>>>>> instead of video it shows in conference an tv-like interferences >>>>>>>>> and sound is going on and off. >>>>>>>>> Firefox works fine. Also previous versions were going well. >>>>>>>>> I don't know what can be the reason, probably flash plugin, but if >>>>>>>>> you have no time for frustration of your attendees, ask them not to >>>>>>>>> use >>>>>>>>> last version of Chrome. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>>>>> daria mikhaylova >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> WBR >>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> WBR >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> WBR >>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> WBR >>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> WBR >>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> WBR >> Maxim aka solomax >> >> >> > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax > > > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
