I am totally newcomer, but will try to understand how contributions is
working in OM community (also test page you've gave me link) and try to
dive in and do my best!
thanks again
On 2/11/2015 18:57, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
We accepting documentation contributions ;)
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Daria Mikhaylova
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Wow thank you, Maxim, it's exactly what we were looking for and
searching how to do it.
Seems in new documentation there is no mention of this
possibility, but now I've found it.
Thanks again for help!
daria
On 2/11/2015 09:46, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
Unfortunately network is the bottleneck for video conferences
One can play with parameters in config.xml to decrease video
quality and reduce bandwidth per user
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Daria Mikhaylova
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Good morning!
So we are going quite well, we have virtual server 2-core 2GB
RAM (VPS digital ocean)
and for now maximum we did conference with 6 participants and
smallest video, 4 of them were in Italy, where internet
connection is really really bad.
On 2/11/2015 09:19, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
Here is the message:
http://markmail.org/message/k7pwhdn2vdbzkgmy (you can try to
use google translate)
here are the highlights:
0) they have bad performance with CentOS 6.5 VM
so they got
1) physical server HP DL380 G5 with 4GB RAM and 2x 4-core
CPU Intel Xeon X5450 (3 ГГц). Gigabit Ethernet
2) CentOS 6.6 Final x64
3) OM 3.0.4-SNAPSHOT with all dependencies and third-party tools
as a result:
1) CPU was loaded up to 55%
2) Outgoing network utilization on server was 71 Mbit/sec
3) 15 participants were on network with bandwidth 50
Mbit/sec and it was totally utilized
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 6:04 AM, OpenAr-IT Soluciones
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Maxim, do you know how the Russian team tunned the
server?, do you have the configuration parameters they used?
Thanks in advance
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Maxim Solodovnik
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Thanks! will ask
Actually we have report in Russian mailing list
about successful conference with 18 video windows:
16 with video 240х180 and 2 with 640х480.
They have tuned both server and network
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Daria Mikhaylova
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I will try next time, we chose this video format
only because were not sure if server can hold 5
of us.
Yes CPU usage was high, my laptop is i3-2367M
@1.40 Ghz, RAM 8 64bit
but when testing OM, I've shut down all
applications to see "pure" result.
great! if any day you need additional testers
we'll be happy to help
On 2/10/2015 22:27, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
I saw issues with 90x120 video on Mac, can you
increase the size a bit? (select next larger
option)
According to delay on Windows: was was CPU usage?
We are actually starting to test audio/video
and recording tomorrow morning (Development is
performed using Ubuntu machine so I see no
issues :( )
Will try to reproduce your results tomorrow morning
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Daria
Mikhaylova <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi, Maxim,
We've tested with 3 users and large video
(640x480) with our server and demo-server.
Ubuntu Studio preemptive kernel 14.04 with
Chrome
Windows 7 with Chrome/Firefox
10.9.5 Mac OS Chrome/Firefox
Results are:
for Ubuntu Chrome doesn't create any problem.
for Mac OS same, when entered with Chrome
sound went a little low for both of us.
for Windows Chrome creates delay of 6-8 sec
and sound goes very bad, instead Firefox
doesn't give any problem, real-time.
On your server is exactly the same. 8 sec
delay for windows with Chrome.
Last time 2 of our other participants were
using Mac OS with chrome and couldn't
activate video (in conference total 5
users: 4 video 90x120, 1 audio) and sound
was disappearing to one or to other. When I
asked one of them to test later with
firefox it was working, chrome still was
giving same error.
Hope it can give you some meaningful
information,
thank you again,
daria
On 2/10/2015 15:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
Thanks a lot, we have 3.0.4RC1 (installed
there)
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Daria
Mikhaylova <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
OM 3.0.3
I will try on demo server today when
I'll get testers together and write
you back.
On 2/10/2015 15:02, Maxim Solodovnik
wrote:
What version of OM are you using?
Cant you check if the problem
reproducible on our demo server?
http://om.alteametasoft.com:5080/openmeetings
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 6:00 PM,
Daria Mikhaylova
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Thank you Maxim for looking into
it, if for you works fine,
probably there is other reason
than chrome.
Yesterday I was also trying to
use Chrome (from Windows) to
participate in OM with 5 other
people and it was causing
problems to everyone - people
were not hearing each other, room
was getting stacked, as soon I've
changed to firefox, there was no
problem anymore.
Unfortunatelly I cannot provide
specific steps - the only thing I
am sure, it was not problem of my
internet connection and also our
server was stable (droplet 20$).
I am not expert in video/audio
conferencing, is it true that if
one person has problem with
bandwidth - everyone in the room
suffer? eventually if there is
any setting that permit us to
isolate one with problems so
others are not touched?
thank you again!
daria
On 2/10/2015 09:37, Maxim
Solodovnik wrote:
Just have tried
Google Chrome 40.0.2214.111 (64-bit)
Mac OS X 10.9.5 (iMac)
conference room works as expected
Maybe there are any specific
steps to reproduce?
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:50 PM,
Daria Mikhaylova
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
Hi,
Seems that last version of
google chrome 40.0.2214.111
installed on Mac (3
different computers) gives
strange problem for users of OM,
instead of video it shows in
conference an tv-like
interferences and sound is
going on and off.
Firefox works fine. Also
previous versions were going
well.
I don't know what can be the
reason, probably flash
plugin, but if you have no
time for frustration of your
attendees, ask them not to
use last version of Chrome.
Thank you!
daria mikhaylova
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
