Thanks Aaron,

both 4.0.7 and 4.0.8 are available for testing
I would appreciate if you can check both versions :)

On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at 19:37, Aaron Hepp <[email protected]> wrote:

> On the demo (4.0.8 rb66ef46) there is only about a 5-7 second delay from
> the talking till it is broadcasted (this would be expected depending on
> where the servers are located and the speed of its connection).  Currently
> about the same delay I have on a fresh restart of the OM service on my
> VPS.  I will keep both open all day and see if the delay changes any.
>
> On 1/16/19 11:01 PM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>
> Hello Aaron,
>
> According to `top` our two OM instances consuming not very much memory on
> demo:
>  1186 nobody    20   0 6716968 1.421g  23308 S  20.9  6.0   1116:35 java
>
> 25008 nobody    20   0 6647688 752492  26656 S   1.0  3.0  97:29.05 java
>
>
> 4.0.7 consuming 1.4G (was started right after release, more than 2 weeks
> ago), will additionally check audio delay
>
> java options used differs:
>
> 4.0.7:
> export JAVA_OPTS="-Xrs -Xms4G -Xmx4G -Xss1M -XX:PermSize=192m
> -XX:MaxPermSize=512m -XX:+CMSClassUnloadingEnabled -XX:NewSize=256m
> -XX:SurvivorRatio=16 -XX:MinHeapFreeRatio=20
> -XX:+ExplicitGCInvokesConcurrent -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
> -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true -Xverify:none"
>
> 4.0.8
> export JAVA_OPTS="-Xrs -Xms4G -Xmx4G -Xss1M -XX:+CMSClassUnloadingEnabled
> -XX:NewSize=256m -XX:SurvivorRatio=16 -XX:MinHeapFreeRatio=20
> -XX:+ExplicitGCInvokesConcurrent -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
> -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true -Xverify:none"
>
> 4.0.8 options looks better to me.
>
> Could you also check demo?
> I'll update "next" with most recent build (with most recent wicket)
>
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at 10:12, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Aaron,
>>
>> I'm afraid this might be caused by this
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6629 issue
>> I'll try to double-check on our demo server, and maybe speed up next
>> releases of both wicket and openmeetings
>>
>> Thanks for the report
>>
>> On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at 07:16, Aaron Hepp <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Looks like this has started with 4.0.7, but will need to look into
>>> further.  On Sunday I restarted my VPS (Ubuntu 16.04 core 4vCPU and 6GB
>>> memory)  The only applications I have running on this one is the items
>>> needed to run OpenMeeting (java, libreoffice, etc)  When I start up the
>>> process the memory hovers around 850MB.  During the day people come and go
>>> max at any given time is 15.  Only one room; items in that room are chat, a
>>> screen share, and a single mic broadcasting.  At the end of the day after
>>> everyone is out and the items stopped (screenshare and mic) the memory
>>> usage reports around 1.5GB.  The next day everyone comes and goes as
>>> previous day idle memory after everyone is gone is 2.1GB, today idle was
>>> running @ 2.5GB.  What I have noticed is that usually on the 2nd delay
>>> there starts being a delay in the mic.  Audio is broadcast but there is
>>> about a 30 second delay.  Today was got all the way up to about a minute
>>> delay when the audio would be broadcasted and it gets heard by the users.
>>> So tonight I was testing and the 1min audio delay was still there.  Stop
>>> and started the red5 process re-entered the room and the delay was gone.  I
>>> have included the options in the red5 file to maybe I could need some
>>> tweaking.  As stated this did not really show up till this 4.0.7 as there
>>> had been times the process had ran for weeks without being restarted and
>>> the memory usage would never get above 2GB.
>>>
>>>
>>>     JVM_OPTS="-Xms1024m -Xmx4096m -Xverify:none -XX:+TieredCompilation
>>> -XX:+UseBiasedLocking -XX:InitialCodeCacheSize=8m
>>> -XX:ReservedCodeCacheSize=32m -Dorg.terracotta.quartz.skipUpdateCheck=true
>>> -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=128m  -XX:+DisableExplicitGC -XX:+UseParNewGC
>>> -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC -XX:ParallelGCThreads=4"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
>
>

-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Reply via email to