Hi, I would say in Germany: Durch klicken schalten Sie das Mikrofon aller anderen stumm.
@Peter: What do you think? Best regards Ed > Gesendet: Freitag, 08. März 2019 um 06:59 Uhr > Von: "Maxim Solodovnik" <[email protected]> > An: "Openmeetings user-list" <[email protected]> > Betreff: Re: Rename "exclusive audio" to "mute others"? > > Is this correct German string? > > <entry key="ulist.user.speaks.muteothers"><![CDATA[Benutzer spricht (Durch > klicken können das Mikrofon für anderen stummschalten)]]></entry> > > > On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 at 23:52, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> wrote: > > > OK, will rename > > Thanks for your opinions :) > > > > On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 21:22, Daniel Ascher <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> I agree with Peter. Rename but don't change icon. > >> > >> On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 3:23 AM Peter Dähn <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> rename is ok and icon could be as is > >>> > >>> Am 06.03.19 um 02:57 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: > >>> > >>> Not much discussion here ... > >>> I guess it would be OK to rename the feature to "Mute Others"? > >>> shall the icon be changed? > >>> > >>> On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 at 00:52, Daniel Ascher <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> This is the hover text I see. This seems pretty clear. It does not > >>>> address the issue of whether a participant can turn his or her microphone > >>>> back on after it's muted though. > >>>> > >>>> [image: image.png] > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:56 AM Raphael Fetzer <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>> a few weeks ago I had suggested to revise either the function or the > >>>>> name of "exclusive audio" > >>>>> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1993). Mainly > >>>>> because it can be bypassed by simply turning on the volume of your mic > >>>>> afterwards - even if you're not a mod. From our point of view, this > >>>>> does > >>>>> not do justice to the term "exclusive" which means something that is > >>>>> not > >>>>> easy to achieve and should not be possible to revoke without > >>>>> moderation > >>>>> rights. As Maxim said it would be easier to rename the function than > >>>>> to > >>>>> change the way the function works (other users would lose the right to > >>>>> share audio and only moderator could revoke). So I'd suggest to just > >>>>> rename it to "mute others". What do you think? > >>>>> > >>>>> Raphael > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Daniel Ascher, M.Ed. > >>>> President > >>>> A+ Test Prep and Tutoring > >>>> "Creating Bright Futures" > >>>> > >>>> 505 York Road, Suite 6 > >>>> Jenkintown, PA 19046 > >>>> Office: 215.886.9188 > >>>> Direct: 267.242.9640 > >>>> Click here to schedule a phone call with me. > >>>> <https://www.aplustutoring.com/meetings/aplusadmin/phone-call> > >>>> Sign Up for A+ News and Test Prep Tips! > >>>> <https://www.aplustutoring.com/educational-blog-articles-subscription> > >>>> <http://aplustutoring.com> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> WBR > >>> Maxim aka solomax > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> Daniel Ascher, M.Ed. > >> President > >> A+ Test Prep and Tutoring > >> "Creating Bright Futures" > >> > >> 505 York Road, Suite 6 > >> Jenkintown, PA 19046 > >> Office: 215.886.9188 > >> Direct: 267.242.9640 > >> Click here to schedule a phone call with me. > >> <https://www.aplustutoring.com/meetings/aplusadmin/phone-call> > >> Sign Up for A+ News and Test Prep Tips! > >> <https://www.aplustutoring.com/educational-blog-articles-subscription> > >> <http://aplustutoring.com> > >> > > > > > > -- > > WBR > > Maxim aka solomax > > > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax >
