Better... and aller (all) makes it more clear I think
Am 08.03.19 um 12:20 schrieb BBS Technik:
> Hi,
> I would say in Germany:
>
> Durch klicken schalten Sie das Mikrofon aller anderen stumm.
>
> @Peter: What do you think?
>
> Best regards
> Ed
>
>
>
>> Gesendet: Freitag, 08. März 2019 um 06:59 Uhr
>> Von: "Maxim Solodovnik" <[email protected]>
>> An: "Openmeetings user-list" <[email protected]>
>> Betreff: Re: Rename "exclusive audio" to "mute others"?
>>
>> Is this correct German string?
>>
>> <entry key="ulist.user.speaks.muteothers"><![CDATA[Benutzer spricht (Durch
>> klicken können das Mikrofon für anderen stummschalten)]]></entry>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 at 23:52, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> OK, will rename
>>> Thanks for your opinions :)
>>>
>>> On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 21:22, Daniel Ascher <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I agree with Peter. Rename but don't change icon.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 3:23 AM Peter Dähn <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> rename is ok and icon could be as is
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 06.03.19 um 02:57 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>>>>
>>>>> Not much discussion here ...
>>>>> I guess it would be OK to rename the feature to "Mute Others"?
>>>>> shall the icon be changed?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 at 00:52, Daniel Ascher <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This is the hover text I see. This seems pretty clear. It does not
>>>>>> address the issue of whether a participant can turn his or her microphone
>>>>>> back on after it's muted though.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [image: image.png]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:56 AM Raphael Fetzer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> a few weeks ago I had suggested to revise either the function or the
>>>>>>> name of "exclusive audio"
>>>>>>> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1993). Mainly
>>>>>>> because it can be bypassed by simply turning on the volume of your mic
>>>>>>> afterwards - even if you're not a mod. From our point of view, this
>>>>>>> does
>>>>>>> not do justice to the term "exclusive" which means something that is
>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>> easy to achieve and should not be possible to revoke without
>>>>>>> moderation
>>>>>>> rights. As Maxim said it would be easier to rename the function than
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> change the way the function works (other users would lose the right to
>>>>>>> share audio and only moderator could revoke). So I'd suggest to just
>>>>>>> rename it to "mute others". What do you think?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Raphael
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Daniel Ascher, M.Ed.
>>>>>> President
>>>>>> A+ Test Prep and Tutoring
>>>>>> "Creating Bright Futures"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 505 York Road, Suite 6
>>>>>> Jenkintown, PA 19046
>>>>>> Office: 215.886.9188
>>>>>> Direct: 267.242.9640
>>>>>> Click here to schedule a phone call with me.
>>>>>> <https://www.aplustutoring.com/meetings/aplusadmin/phone-call>
>>>>>> Sign Up for A+ News and Test Prep Tips!
>>>>>> <https://www.aplustutoring.com/educational-blog-articles-subscription>
>>>>>> <http://aplustutoring.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> WBR
>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel Ascher, M.Ed.
>>>> President
>>>> A+ Test Prep and Tutoring
>>>> "Creating Bright Futures"
>>>>
>>>> 505 York Road, Suite 6
>>>> Jenkintown, PA 19046
>>>> Office: 215.886.9188
>>>> Direct: 267.242.9640
>>>> Click here to schedule a phone call with me.
>>>> <https://www.aplustutoring.com/meetings/aplusadmin/phone-call>
>>>> Sign Up for A+ News and Test Prep Tips!
>>>> <https://www.aplustutoring.com/educational-blog-articles-subscription>
>>>> <http://aplustutoring.com>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> WBR
>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
