Hello Peter,

On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 12:00, Peter-Otto Weber <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello Maxim,
>
>
>
> we had the Problem with customers behind a Firewall.
>
> There, only „Standard Browsing“ on 80/443 was open. 5443 was blocked in
> the Firewall.
>
> So they were not able to even get the web interface.
>
>
>
> I started to think about this as in Home Office constellations there were
> less or no Problems.
>
>
>
> There will be maybe a test with the same user after i switched to 443.
> This will bring the info for accessing the web interface.
>

Both KMS and OM can be set-up to use same 443
Unfortunately TURN still might be required, and it is impossible to set it
up on single port


>
>
> UDP still will be problematic.
>
>
>
> Maybe „Tunneling in https“ might be possible?
>
> There‘ some products, installing a Client and they even seem to work over
> a Proxy without Firewall Problems.
>

TURN was designed to resolve client addresses behind the NAT and proxy in
case it is not possible
so I'm not sure what else can be done here :(


>
>
> To make it clear – those Solutions in my opinion are nothing else but
> trojan horses – they have the feature to tunnel but nobody knows what
> Information is going through with closed source software.
>
>
>
> It is really a very complex problem but oaybe we can find some Options to
> solve them.
>
>
>
> Due to corona everybody is searching for solutions- As more often the
> closed Software with Client is working with less effort they can grab many
> customers.
>
>
>
> e.g. with Microsoft Teams, skype, alfaview, NetMeeting and so on.
>
>
>
> I’d really prefer a open source solution
>
>
>
> Best wishes
>
> POW
>
> *Von: *Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>
> *Gesendet: *Mittwoch, 6. Mai 2020 01:56
> *An: *Openmeetings user-list <[email protected]>
> *Betreff: *Re: OpenMeetings <-> BigBlueButton
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 06:54, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hello Peter,
>
>
>
> sorry Rene :(
>
> it is too early here, have to drink some coffee :(
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 03:24, R. Scholz <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> conferences with public authorities I had repeatedly problems to connect
> them.
> I think its possible that the reason is a  restrictive firewall-management.
>
> What do you mean? It is better to configure OM on port 443? Or port 80
> (with a separate domain/subdomain)
> so this people can access without problems?
>
>
>
> It is always better to use well-known ports
>
> But I guess your users can access Web-interface, but have issues with
> audio/video, am I right?
>
>
>
> If so there is not much can be done :(
>
> OM and KMS can be set-up to use port 443 (we had successful report on this)
>
> TURN main port can be set to be 80
>
>
>
> BUT this will not be enough due to TURN requires multiple additional UDP
> ports :(((
>
>
>
> This need to be investigated
>
> Better with remote access to the "trouble client" :((
>
>
>
>
> Another question: Have anybody made a test with a chinese university?  Is
> it possible to connect from ther to a OM-server outside China?
>
>
>
> We do have Chinese users in JIRA from time to time, but no reports
>
> Chinese Great Firewall is very restrictive, some years ago it block Maven
> central repository ... :(
>
>
>
>
> With best regards,
>
> René
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Am 05.05.2020 um 07:58 schrieb Peter-Otto Weber:
>
> I just got in first contact with „bigbluebutton“.
>
>
>
> It seems to be very similar to openmeetings but – as i suggested before –
> has a better implementation of video arrangement.
>
>
>
> All videos automatically were arranged above the whitboard – i like it.
>
>
>
> What i wonder is ,why open meetings needs to use specific https port and
> bigbluebutton does not?
>
>
>
> The main problem is with customers having a firewall allowing only 80/443.
> We had scheduled a meeting with customers that had to be canceled due to
> networking / firewall problems.
>
>
>
> Using 80/443 like on bigbluebutton would make everything much easier? Is
> this possible?
>
>
>
> Best wishes
>
>
>
> POW
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Best regards,
> Maxim
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Best regards,
> Maxim
>
>
>


-- 
Best regards,
Maxim

Reply via email to