Thanks for letting us know, Anirudha & James. Makes sense to keep the 1.0
branch going in light of this hard dependency you have.

    James

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Anirudha Khanna <akha...@marinsoftware.com
> wrote:

> Same for us, we are also using CDH5 and it would be a big setback if
> HBase-1.0 support is stopped by the community.
>
> Anirudha
>
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 12:01 PM, James Heather <
> james.heat...@mendeley.com> wrote:
>
>> We're using CDH5, which runs HBase 1.0.
>>
>> I think it would kill the whole Phoenix project for us if there were no
>> 1.0 support.
>>
>> James
>>
>>
>> On 19/09/15 01:53, James Taylor wrote:
>>
>> +user list
>>
>> Please let us know if you're counting on HBase 1.0 support given that we
>> have HBase 1.1 support.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> James
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Seems like a better question for the users mailing list. Probably it
>>> depends on where the vendors are going, if there will be a long-running
>>> 1.0.x release line, we should keep it around. From Apache perspective,
>>> it's
>>> probably fine to drop 1.0.x in favor of 1.1.x. HBase 1.2 is right around
>>> the corner too...
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 4:42 PM, James Taylor < <jamestay...@apache.org>
>>> jamestay...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Given that we have Phoenix support for HBase 1.1, does anyone feel
>>> like we
>>> > need to continue with Phoenix releases for HBase 1.0?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > James
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to