Thanks for letting us know, Anirudha & James. Makes sense to keep the 1.0 branch going in light of this hard dependency you have.
James On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Anirudha Khanna <akha...@marinsoftware.com > wrote: > Same for us, we are also using CDH5 and it would be a big setback if > HBase-1.0 support is stopped by the community. > > Anirudha > > On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 12:01 PM, James Heather < > james.heat...@mendeley.com> wrote: > >> We're using CDH5, which runs HBase 1.0. >> >> I think it would kill the whole Phoenix project for us if there were no >> 1.0 support. >> >> James >> >> >> On 19/09/15 01:53, James Taylor wrote: >> >> +user list >> >> Please let us know if you're counting on HBase 1.0 support given that we >> have HBase 1.1 support. >> >> Thanks, >> James >> >> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> Seems like a better question for the users mailing list. Probably it >>> depends on where the vendors are going, if there will be a long-running >>> 1.0.x release line, we should keep it around. From Apache perspective, >>> it's >>> probably fine to drop 1.0.x in favor of 1.1.x. HBase 1.2 is right around >>> the corner too... >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 4:42 PM, James Taylor < <jamestay...@apache.org> >>> jamestay...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Given that we have Phoenix support for HBase 1.1, does anyone feel >>> like we >>> > need to continue with Phoenix releases for HBase 1.0? >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > James >>> > >>> >> >> >> >