FYI, HBase has recently decided to discontinue the 1.0.x line. I believe the pending 1.0.3 release is expected to be the last.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:36 AM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks for letting us know, Anirudha & James. Makes sense to keep the 1.0 > branch going in light of this hard dependency you have. > > James > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Anirudha Khanna < > akha...@marinsoftware.com> wrote: > >> Same for us, we are also using CDH5 and it would be a big setback if >> HBase-1.0 support is stopped by the community. >> >> Anirudha >> >> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 12:01 PM, James Heather < >> james.heat...@mendeley.com> wrote: >> >>> We're using CDH5, which runs HBase 1.0. >>> >>> I think it would kill the whole Phoenix project for us if there were no >>> 1.0 support. >>> >>> James >>> >>> >>> On 19/09/15 01:53, James Taylor wrote: >>> >>> +user list >>> >>> Please let us know if you're counting on HBase 1.0 support given that we >>> have HBase 1.1 support. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> James >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Seems like a better question for the users mailing list. Probably it >>>> depends on where the vendors are going, if there will be a long-running >>>> 1.0.x release line, we should keep it around. From Apache perspective, >>>> it's >>>> probably fine to drop 1.0.x in favor of 1.1.x. HBase 1.2 is right around >>>> the corner too... >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 4:42 PM, James Taylor < >>>> <jamestay...@apache.org>jamestay...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > Given that we have Phoenix support for HBase 1.1, does anyone feel >>>> like we >>>> > need to continue with Phoenix releases for HBase 1.0? >>>> > >>>> > Thanks, >>>> > James >>>> > >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
