>>> @BXML public Object myObject; >>> >>> right? >> >> Yes, that's right. > > Still, wouldn't it look prettier with "@BXML public Object myObject" in the > examples? Easier to explain the public than showing the ugly cast and string > lookup? :) I fair people will get the wrong impression and think Pivot is > clunky when they see the examples :)
That might imply that annotated values must be public, which breaks encapsulation and could leave a far worse impression. :-)
