> Den 06.06.2011 22:27, skrev Greg Brown: >>> Oh, I would like to add that it wasn't obvious why the BXML code didn't >>> work without signing. Perhaps more prominent indication in the tutorials or >>> BXML primer would be good. >> >> Agreed. >> >>> It's more likely, new users will just use the public syntax by copy/pasting >>> examples. >> >> This is another good reason not to use public fields in the examples. > > That also means that people will copy the namespace.get() code instead of > using @BXML. You are signing some of the examples, why not just sign them all > and use @BXML all the way? Most applications needs to be/should be signed > anyway.
Possibly, but the examples don't, and a prospective developer may wonder why a simple tutorial application requires system access. It also makes an application take slightly longer to start up.
