Hello Dave, thanks for the link. I have the 4.0 src upzipped but unfortunately 
I have encountered some issues. At the command-line I am invoking ant clean/ant 
build with the following results:

BUILD FAILED
C:\Documents and Settings\davidb\My 
Documents\dev\apache-roller-src-4.0\build.xml:141: C:\Documents and 
Settings\davidb\My Documents\tools\lib not fou
nd.

In a weak diagnostic effort I issued and studied the output from ant -debug 
with nothing jumping out at me.
I have studied the properties.xmlf extensively.
I created an additional ant target with the following <echo> messages:

<echo message="base.path                = ${base.path}" />
<echo message="business.path    = ${business.path}" />

And, as expected the above properties do not display.

I also pointed Eclipse to the apache-roller-src-4.0 directory and created a 
General project with an eclipse builder using the build.xml on disk. This type 
of Eclipse project is a minimally invasive Eclipse project type and so I do not 
think Eclipse is doing anything unusual or corrupting. I do find this somewhat 
mysterious that Eclipse is finding the build error and message as stated above 
from the command-line results. The difference is that Eclipse is finding this 
same error condition at various places downstream from line #141. Time allowing 
please advise, David.

Dave wrote ..
> On 10/1/07, david <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello Dave, suggestion understand and executed. The results follow. 
> > Not-to-worry:
> I have been working on this for weeks so take your time. Please advise,
> David.
> 
> Looks like you are hitting an out-of-memory problem now. Try upping
> your Ant memory -- take a look at build.sh to see how to do that.
> 
> And by the way, you might want to try a Roller 4.0 RC instead. Roller
> 4.0 is *very* close to release. It's better than 3.1 and if you get up
> and running with 4.0 you won't have to do the 3.1 -> 4.0 upgrade.
> 
> You can find the 4.0 RC4 files here:
> 
>    http://people.apache.org/~snoopdave/apache-roller-4.0-rc4/
> 
> - Dave

Reply via email to