But what if I do not want to use JMS!! If my component is not JMS compliant
how do I access it from a remote JBI container?

Thanks,
Poonam.
.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Davies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: [servicemix-user] Is ServiceMix distributed??


> Hi Poonam,
>
> the JMS Flow is based on ActiveMQ (it relies on advisories for
> notifications of endpoints etc.  - so is ActiveMQ specific). We will
> be adding an example for setting up the configuration. By default
> when using JMSFlow it uses the ActiveMQ peer:// transport, that uses
> multicast to discover other nodes.  The peer:// protocol is reliable,
> so handles fail-over automatically.
> As JMSFlow uses Queue's internally, it will automatically handle load
> balancing across JBIContainers and handle fail-over scenarios like
> you've suggested.
>
> cheers,
>
> Rob
>
> On 23 Sep 2005, at 11:07, Poonam wrote:
>
> > I agree Rob that using JMS you can specify remote JMS destinations.
> > But, If I have two JBI container running on two separate machines.
> > How do I
> > relate them?  Where do I specify in the config  file?
> > Can I do something like: " If one machine goes down then can the
> > other take
> > over the failed situation?
> >
> > -Poonam
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Rob Davies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 4:57 AM
> > Subject: Re: [servicemix-user] Is ServiceMix distributed??
> >
> >
> >
> >> Hi Julien,
> >>
> >> yes ServiceMix does. Currently it supports clustering, but there is a
> >> JMS NMR distribution mechanism (we call them Flows) that will be
> >> available in the next release (due in about a week) - or so.
> >>
> >> cheers,
> >>
> >> Rob
> >> On 22 Sep 2005, at 22:53, Julien Martin wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> From what I understand, the JBI spec does not say much about
> >>>> distributed NMR.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> Does ServiceMix provide for a distrubuted NMR?
> >>> Thanks in advance.
> >>> Julien.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to