Rob, Thanks. I was pretty sure that was going to be the answer. I've started playing with the Client API, but didn't want to go too far without confirming that I was on the right path.
Stephen Ferrando [EMAIL PROTECTED] 212-480-4112 x5800 www.dbconcert.com -----Original Message----- From: Rob Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 10:18 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [servicemix-user] Is ServiceMix distributed?? You can use the ServiceMixClient - they'll be an example of remoting soon ... cheers, Rob On 23 Sep 2005, at 14:15, Stephen Ferrando wrote: > While we are on the subject, is there any way to connect components > that > do not sit inside a JBI container to ServiceMix (without using JMS or > Web Services)? > > > Stephen Ferrando > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 212-480-4112 x5800 > www.dbconcert.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Poonam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 8:14 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [servicemix-user] Is ServiceMix distributed?? > > But what if I do not want to use JMS!! If my component is not JMS > compliant > how do I access it from a remote JBI container? > > Thanks, > Poonam. > . > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rob Davies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 3:58 PM > Subject: Re: [servicemix-user] Is ServiceMix distributed?? > > > >> Hi Poonam, >> >> the JMS Flow is based on ActiveMQ (it relies on advisories for >> notifications of endpoints etc. - so is ActiveMQ specific). We will >> be adding an example for setting up the configuration. By default >> when using JMSFlow it uses the ActiveMQ peer:// transport, that uses >> multicast to discover other nodes. The peer:// protocol is reliable, >> so handles fail-over automatically. >> As JMSFlow uses Queue's internally, it will automatically handle load >> balancing across JBIContainers and handle fail-over scenarios like >> you've suggested. >> >> cheers, >> >> Rob >> >> On 23 Sep 2005, at 11:07, Poonam wrote: >> >> >>> I agree Rob that using JMS you can specify remote JMS destinations. >>> But, If I have two JBI container running on two separate machines. >>> How do I >>> relate them? Where do I specify in the config file? >>> Can I do something like: " If one machine goes down then can the >>> other take >>> over the failed situation? >>> >>> -Poonam >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Rob Davies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 4:57 AM >>> Subject: Re: [servicemix-user] Is ServiceMix distributed?? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Hi Julien, >>>> >>>> yes ServiceMix does. Currently it supports clustering, but there is >>>> > a > >>>> JMS NMR distribution mechanism (we call them Flows) that will be >>>> available in the next release (due in about a week) - or so. >>>> >>>> cheers, >>>> >>>> Rob >>>> On 22 Sep 2005, at 22:53, Julien Martin wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> From what I understand, the JBI spec does not say much about >>>>>> distributed NMR. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Does ServiceMix provide for a distrubuted NMR? >>>>> Thanks in advance. >>>>> Julien. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > >
