On 8/21/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Craig, Do you still think we can have this in a 1.0.4 release before Apache Con? I'm thinking this is 100% for the stable release and a stable release is a must have for Apache Con.
In my mind, there's two things standing in the way of a stable 1.0.x release ... fixing the Dialog issues and helping Standalone Tiles get out the door so we don't have a snapshot dependency. These are the top two things on my personal priority list, and I'm going to try my hardest to focus on them, instead of all the other cool enhancement ideas we're accumulating. In practical terms, we've got two months to do this for ApacheCon. I agree that should be our goal. Sean
ps. Please post to the dev list once the wiki goes up. I tend to gloss over most of the wiki messages in my sea of email.
I'll post to both lists once I set up the basic page (probably tonight). Craig On 8/21/06, Hermod Opstvedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi > > As always, there are priorities. I guess a note will be made when we can use > the whiteboard. > > Hermod > > > -----Opprinnelig melding----- > Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av Craig > McClanahan > Sendt: 21. august 2006 19:35 > Til: [email protected] > Emne: Re: Shale dialogs > > On 8/21/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > There was a hint on the list a little back that a solution for the Dialogs > > problems was near - Any progress on this > > > > http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-175 > > http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-48 > > > I'm not sure "near" would be the word I'd use :-). But now that 1.0.3is > wrapped (release vote is currently underway on the dev list), I'm going to > turn my attention to this area. My current thinking is to use a wiki page > as a whiteboard to capture requirements and look at design alternatives, > before we start coding again. > > I had hoped that these would be solved prior to 1.3 release. > > > I would have too ... but there was some pent up demand for some of the other > changes in 1.0.3 -- and the switch to using Maven2 for building Shale was a > huge amount of work, even though it'll have lots of downstream benefits. > > Hermod > > > Craig > >
