From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > facelet's is a viewlayer and templating > > shale has clay, which is sorta overlap thing. > the templating is similar like Tiles, but tiles is kinda old school > and facelet's is pure jsf.
Ahh, that's not a fair comparison. Clay is also pure JSF templating solution. Clay has metadata inheritance like tiles where facelets only has composition. Inheritance might be too tricky for some. For example, MS claimed VB was object oriented for years. Composition is an easy way out :--) > > I use shale (viewcontroller and remote) and the viewcontroller works > pretty much fine within a facelets page. > > so shale is fine w/ faclets. > has benefits like "controller" and templating/viewlayer > > HTH, > M > > On 10/13/06, ying lcs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have a question about Shale and Facelet framework. > > > > I understand they are both JSF extension framework. But are they > > competing framework? > > Or do they overlap in functionality? > > > > Thank you. > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh > > further stuff: > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
