>From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Gary I said Tiles is old school. > Clay is JSF, like Facelets so both rock... :) >
Oh right, my bad. Rock On! > On 10/13/06, Gary VanMatre wrote: > > From: "Matthias Wessendorf" > > > facelet's is a viewlayer and templating > > > > > > shale has clay, which is sorta overlap thing. > > > the templating is similar like Tiles, but tiles is kinda old school > > > and facelet's is pure jsf. > > > > > > Ahh, that's not a fair comparison. Clay is also pure JSF templating > > solution. > > Clay has metadata inheritance like tiles where facelets only has > > composition. > > Inheritance might be too tricky for some. For example, MS claimed VB was > > object oriented for years. Composition is an easy way out :--) > > > > > > > > > > I use shale (viewcontroller and remote) and the viewcontroller works > > > pretty much fine within a facelets page. > > > > > > so shale is fine w/ faclets. > > > has benefits like "controller" and templating/viewlayer > > > > > > HTH, > > > M > > > > > > On 10/13/06, ying lcs wrote: > > > > I have a question about Shale and Facelet framework. > > > > > > > > I understand they are both JSF extension framework. But are they > > > > competing framework? > > > > Or do they overlap in functionality? > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh > > > > > > further stuff: > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh > > further stuff: > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
