I would prefer to keep them for the common used tags - its a lightweight way to get into clay ( which i am still trying to understand the whole thing ^^ ).
Torsten Am Dienstag, den 17.10.2006, 18:45 +0200 schrieb Hermod Opstvedt: > Hi > > There seems be some following around the implicit mappings (hence the mail > sequence), and giving it some thought might be useful. Maybe having them > around is a way of easing the transition into Clay for somebody less > experienced, sort of halfway Clay :). > > Personally I could live without them. > > Hermod > > -----Opprinnelig melding----- > Fra: Gary VanMatre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sendt: 17. oktober 2006 17:10 > Til: [email protected] > Emne: RE: Clay: outputLink - href unused, gets cleared. > > >From: Torsten Krah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > I am used form, input text ones, submit ones and labels. Works like > > expected - only the anchor one exhibits this behaviour - so maybe my > > setup/configuration is messed up or its a bug. > > Maybe someone reading this and got time and clay with him ;) can confirm > > or deny this ;-). > > > > > The implicit mapping of the anchored link "a" is to the outputLink component > versus the commandLink. > > I do think you have found an issue. Try adding a "value" attribute to hold > the href value. The default mapping doesn't seem to have the association. > > <a href="#" value="http://shale.apache.org"; target="_self" alt="Shale web > site">Back</a> > > If this works for you, please create a JIRA issue > (https://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/Dashboard.jspa). > > There are a couple other implicit mappings missing. I was thinking about > removing the implicit mappings and requiring the jsfid for binding to a JSF > component. > > The implicit mapping is a under used feature that doesn't have great > coverage. We should build it up or take it away. I'm favoring taking it > away after the next release. Any thoughts? > > Gary >
