>From: Torsten Krah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I would prefer to keep them for the common used tags - its a lightweight > way to get into clay ( which i am still trying to understand the whole > thing ^^ ). >
Ok, let's keep an eye on implicit mappings that are missing or broken. I'll get to SHALE-313 in the next couple of days. > Torsten > Gary > Am Dienstag, den 17.10.2006, 18:45 +0200 schrieb Hermod Opstvedt: > > Hi > > > > There seems be some following around the implicit mappings (hence the mail > > sequence), and giving it some thought might be useful. Maybe having them > > around is a way of easing the transition into Clay for somebody less > > experienced, sort of halfway Clay :). > > > > Personally I could live without them. > > > > Hermod > > > > -----Opprinnelig melding----- > > Fra: Gary VanMatre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sendt: 17. oktober 2006 17:10 > > Til: [email protected] > > Emne: RE: Clay: outputLink - href unused, gets cleared. > > > > >From: Torsten Krah > > > > > > I am used form, input text ones, submit ones and labels. Works like > > > expected - only the anchor one exhibits this behaviour - so maybe my > > > setup/configuration is messed up or its a bug. > > > Maybe someone reading this and got time and clay with him ;) can confirm > > > or deny this ;-). > > > > > > > > > The implicit mapping of the anchored link "a" is to the outputLink > > component > > versus the commandLink. > > > > I do think you have found an issue. Try adding a "value" attribute to hold > > the href value. The default mapping doesn't seem to have the association. > > > > Back > > > > If this works for you, please create a JIRA issue > > (https://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/Dashboard.jspa). > > > > There are a couple other implicit mappings missing. I was thinking about > > removing the implicit mappings and requiring the jsfid for binding to a JSF > > component. > > > > The implicit mapping is a under used feature that doesn't have great > > coverage. We should build it up or take it away. I'm favoring taking it > > away after the next release. Any thoughts? > > > > Gary > > >
