On 1/22/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I guess since other will run into this,
I created a ticket and marked it as fixed for 1.1.0
so the release notes contain that ;)

https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-394

<snip/>

Thanks, seems like a good example of something that should be applied
to the 1_0_X branch too. Would you like to do that as well?

-Rahul


On 1/21/07, Adrian Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you very much.
>
> So, I suppose I don't need to open an issue anymore ?
>
> ----- Message d'origine ----
> De : Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> À : [email protected]
> Envoyé le : Dimanche, 21 Janvier 2007, 23h40mn 24s
> Objet : Re: [Shale view 1.0.4]
>
> fixed already in current trunk
>
> (see svn commit: r497775)
>
> or
>
> 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/shale/framework/trunk/shale-view/src/main/java/org/apache/shale/view/faces/ViewPhaseListener.java?view=diff&r1=497774&r2=497775&pathrev=497775
>
>
> thx,
> Matt
>
> On 1/21/07, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 1/21/07, Adrian Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I think there's a little bug on shale view 1.0.4.
> > >
> > > Shale View : Bug on render response phase when removing view from request
> > > map.
> > >
> > > Error in org.apache.shale.view.faces.ViewPhaseListener, method
> > > afterRenderResponse, lien 233 :
> > > iterator obtained from map, code calling map.remove, and afterward using
> > > iterator which generated ConcurrentModificationException.
> > >
<snip/>

Reply via email to