On 1/22/07, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/22/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess since other will run into this, > I created a ticket and marked it as fixed for 1.1.0 > so the release notes contain that ;) > > https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-394 > <snip/> Thanks, seems like a good example of something that should be applied to the 1_0_X branch too. Would you like to do that as well?
Agreed, although in general I also think you're setting a good precedent by asking for agreement (lazy consensus) first. -Rahul Craig
On 1/21/07, Adrian Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thank you very much. > > > > So, I suppose I don't need to open an issue anymore ? > > > > ----- Message d'origine ---- > > De : Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > À : [email protected] > > Envoyé le : Dimanche, 21 Janvier 2007, 23h40mn 24s > > Objet : Re: [Shale view 1.0.4] > > > > fixed already in current trunk > > > > (see svn commit: r497775) > > > > or > > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/shale/framework/trunk/shale-view/src/main/java/org/apache/shale/view/faces/ViewPhaseListener.java?view=diff&r1=497774&r2=497775&pathrev=497775 > > > > > > thx, > > Matt > > > > On 1/21/07, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 1/21/07, Adrian Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I think there's a little bug on shale view 1.0.4. > > > > > > > > Shale View : Bug on render response phase when removing view from request > > > > map. > > > > > > > > Error in org.apache.shale.view.faces.ViewPhaseListener, method > > > > afterRenderResponse, lien 233 : > > > > iterator obtained from map, code calling map.remove, and afterward using > > > > iterator which generated ConcurrentModificationException. > > > > <snip/>
