Hello everybody, We're using slf4j inside Spring/OSGi for logging and so far it saved us from quite a lot of trouble (imagine commons-logging and classloading discovery in OSGi) not to mention that having the official distribution OSGified is quite a time saver.
At the moment we are left with one major issue and that is having a jcl11-over-sfl4j bridge. AFAIK, the only difference from jcl104 is that trace() calls are using trace level rather then debug. I have several code bases where trace is used extensively for low level debugging and the jcl-104 behavior causes a lot of unnecessary output and thus prevents to some extent using slf4j. At least for me, it would be great if the jcl-11 behavior would be supported. Thanks! -- Costin _______________________________________________ user mailing list [email protected] http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
