Hi Costin, At 06:08 PM 3/31/2007, Costin Leau wrote: >Hello everybody, > >We're using slf4j inside Spring/OSGi for logging and so far it saved us >from quite a lot of trouble (imagine commons-logging and classloading >discovery in OSGi) not to mention that having the official distribution >OSGified is quite a time saver.
:-) >At the moment we are left with one major issue and that is having a >jcl11-over-sfl4j bridge. AFAIK, the only difference from jcl104 is that >trace() calls are using trace level rather then debug. >I have several code bases where trace is used extensively for low level >debugging and the jcl-104 behavior causes a lot of unnecessary output >and thus prevents to some extent using slf4j. > >At least for me, it would be great if the jcl-11 behavior would be >supported. I suppose you are using log4j as the underlying logging system. Yes? Anyway, since SLF4J does not have a trace method in its API, it would be quite impossible to make it work in jcl104-over-slf4j. Does it make sense? >-- >Costin -- Ceki Gülcü Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java. http://logback.qos.ch _______________________________________________ user mailing list [email protected] http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
