Hi Eric, I was not aware that commons-configuration was using NoOpLog directly. Thank you for the valuable information.
I just added the o.a.c.l.impl.NoOpLog and SimpleLog classes to the jcl104-over-slf4j project. Would you mind checking the code from SVN and then build it to see if it works? Many thanks in advance, Eric Yung wrote: > Hi, > > I have download the commons-configuration 1.4 and found that they are > using org.apache.commons.logging.impl.NoOpLog directly. I think it may > be possible that the user of jcl will use either instantiate > org.apache.commons.logging.NoOpLog or > org.apache.commons.logging.SimpleLog as the default implementation when > there is NO jcl logger found. > > I would suggest to include both classes into the jcl104-over-slf4j.jar > as there is NO dependency for both classes. It saves a lot of trouble > when someone is using the commons-configuration 1.4 like libraries. > Right now, I have to extract those classes and include in my application > manually. > > What do you think? > > > Regards, > Eric > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > user mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > -- Ceki Gülcü Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java. http://logback.qos.ch _______________________________________________ user mailing list [email protected] http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
