Hi Ceki, I have test the one from svn and it works.
Thanks, Eric Ceki Gulcu wrote: > Hi Eric, > > I was not aware that commons-configuration was using NoOpLog directly. Thank > you > for the valuable information. > > I just added the o.a.c.l.impl.NoOpLog and SimpleLog classes to the > jcl104-over-slf4j project. > > Would you mind checking the code from SVN and then build it to see if it > works? > > Many thanks in advance, > > Eric Yung wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have download the commons-configuration 1.4 and found that they are >> using org.apache.commons.logging.impl.NoOpLog directly. I think it may >> be possible that the user of jcl will use either instantiate >> org.apache.commons.logging.NoOpLog or >> org.apache.commons.logging.SimpleLog as the default implementation when >> there is NO jcl logger found. >> >> I would suggest to include both classes into the jcl104-over-slf4j.jar >> as there is NO dependency for both classes. It saves a lot of trouble >> when someone is using the commons-configuration 1.4 like libraries. >> Right now, I have to extract those classes and include in my application >> manually. >> >> What do you think? >> >> >> Regards, >> Eric >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> user mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >> >> > > _______________________________________________ user mailing list [email protected] http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
