Hi Ankur,

FYI - in a naive attempt to enhance your solution, managed to create 
MergePatternPath. I think it works in expected way (atleast for the traversing 
problem in last email). 

I modified your code a bit. Also instead of EdgePattern I used List of 
Functions that match the whole edge triplets along the path... and it returns a 
*new Graph* which preserves the vertices attributes, but only with new merged 
edges.

MergePatternPath:
https://github.com/hihellobolke/spark/blob/graphx-traversal/graphx/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/graphx/lib/MergePatternPath.scala

Here's a Gist of how I was using it:
https://gist.github.com/hihellobolke/c8e6c97cefed714258ad

This prolly is very naive attempt :-). Is there any possibility of adding it to 
the graphx.lib albeit one which is sophisticated & performant?

Thanks

On 08-Jul-2014, at 4:57 pm, HHB <hihellobo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Ankur,
> 
> I was trying out the PatterMatcher it works for smaller path, but I see that 
> for the longer ones it continues to run forever...
> 
> Here's what I am trying: 
> https://gist.github.com/hihellobolke/dd2dc0fcebba485975d1  (The example of 3 
> share traders transacting in appl shares)
> 
> The first edge pattern list (Line 66) works okay, but the second one (Line 
> 76) never return..
> 
> Thanks,
> Gautam
> 
> 
> On 05-Jul-2014, at 3:23 pm, Ankur Dave <ankurd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Interesting problem! My understanding is that you want to (1) find paths 
>> matching a particular pattern, and (2) add edges between the start and end 
>> vertices of the matched paths.
>> 
>> For (1), I implemented a pattern matcher for GraphX that iteratively 
>> accumulates partial pattern matches. I used your example in the unit test.
>> 
>> For (2), you can take the output of the pattern matcher (the set of matching 
>> paths organized by their terminal vertices) and construct a set of new edges 
>> using the initial and terminal vertices of each path. Then you can make a 
>> new graph consisting of the union of the original edge set and the new 
>> edges. Let me know if you'd like help with this.
>> 
>> Ankur
>> 
> 

Reply via email to