Thanks you. I'll try to pursuit the behavior of Apache Storm. I am going to migrate to 0.9.2 from 0.9.1. So, the behavior may be changed. I'll report this problem in some weeks.
2015-01-08 17:23 GMT+09:00 UmaraDissa1 . <[email protected]>: > Hi Miyakawa, > > I don't think any tasks that were reassigned to a different node due a node > failure would be dynamically assigned back to the original node that failed > when that node comes back up again. > > I haven't observed this, but take this with a grain of salt as I am a bit of > a newbie at Storm myself. > > > Cheers, > Kosala. > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Miyakawa Takeshi <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hi, i am new to storm and i met a problem with tasks reassigning when >> a worker node downs and recover. >> >> worker node 1-5 running my cluster. >> i submit a topology to my cluster, and nimbus assign some task to node 1. >> when node 1 is down (whole machine level), supervisor and all worker >> processes down too, >> tasks assigned to node 1 are reassign to other nodes. it's OK. >> >> but, when node 1 reboot and supervisor has start, tasks (reassign to >> other nodes) return to node 1! >> >> i don't want to such returning. >> >> so, i have two questions, >> >> Q1. such returning is proper behavior to Apache Storm? >> >> Q2. if answer of Q1 is yes, does exist some ways to prevent such >> returning? >> >> i am a Japanese and poor at English, sorry. >> >> i use Apache Storm 0.9.1 now. > >
