I didn't notice anything in the release notes of 0.9.2 ( https://storm.apache.org/2014/06/25/storm092-released.html) which would indicate any change of this sort. Also, the version I am using is 0.9.2-incubating as well.
Do keep us updated though On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Miyakawa Takeshi <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks you. > > I'll try to pursuit the behavior of Apache Storm. > I am going to migrate to 0.9.2 from 0.9.1. > So, the behavior may be changed. > I'll report this problem in some weeks. > > 2015-01-08 17:23 GMT+09:00 UmaraDissa1 . <[email protected]>: > > Hi Miyakawa, > > > > I don't think any tasks that were reassigned to a different node due a > node > > failure would be dynamically assigned back to the original node that > failed > > when that node comes back up again. > > > > I haven't observed this, but take this with a grain of salt as I am a > bit of > > a newbie at Storm myself. > > > > > > Cheers, > > Kosala. > > > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Miyakawa Takeshi <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, i am new to storm and i met a problem with tasks reassigning when > >> a worker node downs and recover. > >> > >> worker node 1-5 running my cluster. > >> i submit a topology to my cluster, and nimbus assign some task to node > 1. > >> when node 1 is down (whole machine level), supervisor and all worker > >> processes down too, > >> tasks assigned to node 1 are reassign to other nodes. it's OK. > >> > >> but, when node 1 reboot and supervisor has start, tasks (reassign to > >> other nodes) return to node 1! > >> > >> i don't want to such returning. > >> > >> so, i have two questions, > >> > >> Q1. such returning is proper behavior to Apache Storm? > >> > >> Q2. if answer of Q1 is yes, does exist some ways to prevent such > >> returning? > >> > >> i am a Japanese and poor at English, sorry. > >> > >> i use Apache Storm 0.9.1 now. > > > > >
