Thanks for your help.
Denis
Le 28/05/2015 15:15, Jeffery Maass a écrit :
Did you know that a horse can race a human and the human will win --
in the first several yards? Spread out the race longer and the horse
will always win.
The tests being run aren't covering enough situations. Storm was
designed to take business code and scale it out in order to handle
massive amounts of data. Try increasing your records per minute by a
thousand fold and see how local mode functions versus cluster mode and
business code spread out over multiple nodes.
Thank you for your time!
+++++++++++++++++++++
Jeff Maass <mailto:[email protected]>
linkedin.com/in/jeffmaass <http://linkedin.com/in/jeffmaass>
stackoverflow.com/users/373418/maassql
<http://stackoverflow.com/users/373418/maassql>
+++++++++++++++++++++
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:46 AM, Denis DEBARBIEUX
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Dear all,
I measured the performance of my topology written in pure storm
(no trident). I compared it in local mode and then in cluster. The
two experiements were done on the same single server (deployed
with docker in cluster configuration). The result was that *the
local mode is 20 times faster than in cluster configuration.*
I am surprised about it. What could I do to improve the
performance on the cluster?
Thanks for your help.
D. Debarbieux
------------------------------------------------------------------------
<http://www.avast.com/>
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée
par le logiciel antivirus Avast.
www.avast.com <http://www.avast.com/>
---
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel
antivirus Avast.
http://www.avast.com
