Denis:

I would avail myself of Nathan Leung's offer to help.  His statement was
that a factor of 20 is much too great a difference.  He asked for more
details.

Thank you for your time!

+++++++++++++++++++++
Jeff Maass <[email protected]>
linkedin.com/in/jeffmaass
stackoverflow.com/users/373418/maassql
+++++++++++++++++++++


On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Denis DEBARBIEUX <[email protected]>
wrote:

>  Thanks for your help.
>
> Denis
>
>
> Le 28/05/2015 15:15, Jeffery Maass a écrit :
>
> Did you know that a horse can race a human and the human will win -- in
> the first several yards?  Spread out the race longer and the horse will
> always win.
>
> The tests being run aren't covering enough situations.  Storm was designed
> to take business code and scale it out in order to handle massive amounts
> of data.  Try increasing your records per minute by a thousand fold and see
> how local mode functions versus cluster mode and business code spread out
> over multiple nodes.
>
>    Thank you for your time!
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++
> Jeff Maass <[email protected]>
> linkedin.com/in/jeffmaass
> stackoverflow.com/users/373418/maassql
> +++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:46 AM, Denis DEBARBIEUX <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>  Dear all,
>>
>> I measured the performance of my topology written in pure storm (no
>> trident). I compared it in local mode and then in cluster. The two
>> experiements were done on the same single server (deployed with docker in
>> cluster configuration). The result was that *the local mode is 20 times
>> faster than in cluster configuration.*
>>
>> I am surprised about it. What could I do to improve the performance on
>> the cluster?
>>
>> Thanks for your help.
>>
>> D. Debarbieux
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>     <http://www.avast.com/>
>>
>> L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le
>> logiciel antivirus Avast.
>> www.avast.com
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>    <http://www.avast.com/>
>
> L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le
> logiciel antivirus Avast.
> www.avast.com
>
>

Reply via email to