Also I have implemented automatic backpressure mechanism available in
latest storm version. Optimized slow processing bolt code to process
faster.

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018, 2:30 PM Ajeesh <ajeeshreloa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi, I have checked the thread dump, I couldn't find any blocked threads. I
> solved the issue by upgrading Kafka, Storm and Zookeeper applications to
> latest version. Also I was batching few tuples for insertion into database
> and so I was not emitting these tuples until insertion, modified logic to
> emit tuples continously without batching.
>
> On Mar 6, 2018 2:17 AM, "Stig Rohde Døssing" <s...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure whether the functionality exists in Kafka 0.8, but there's
> likely also a console consumer script in your Kafka install's /bin
> directory you might be able to use.
>
> 2018-03-05 21:46 GMT+01:00 Stig Rohde Døssing <s...@apache.org>:
>
>> Not sure if this is what you're asking, but take a look at how
>> storm-kafka fetches messages
>> https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/external/storm-kafka/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/kafka/KafkaUtils.java#L191.
>> You can probably do something similar. Also refer to the Kafka 0.8
>> documentation at https://kafka.apache.org/082/documentation.html,
>> specifically the part about the simple consumer API.
>>
>> 2018-03-05 19:03 GMT+01:00 Ajeesh <ajeeshreloa...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Thanks, I am able to take the offsets but how do I read messages using
>>> specific offset in Kafka? I am using Kafka version 0.8.2.1
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018, 11:26 PM Stig Rohde Døssing <s...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm going to assume you're using storm-kafka, and you're asking how to
>>>> find the current committed offset.
>>>>
>>>> You can find the offsets in your Zookeeper. In your Zookeeper install
>>>> there's a /bin/zkCli.sh script you can use to poke around in the Zookeeper
>>>> node system. The offsets will be somewhere in
>>>> /zk-root-from-your-spout-config/id-from-your-spout-config/topic-name/.
>>>>
>>>> There's a tool to migrate offsets from storm-kafka to
>>>> storm-kafka-client here
>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/external/storm-kafka-migration/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/kafka/migration/KafkaSpoutMigration.java.
>>>> You can very easily modify it to just print the offsets instead (just
>>>> delete line 84 and down in the main method). See also the README at
>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/external/storm-kafka-migration/README.md
>>>>
>>>> 2018-03-05 10:43 GMT+01:00 Ajeesh <ajeeshreloa...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> How to dump Kafka consumer offset?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018, 10:25 PM Erik Weathers <eweath...@groupon.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Agreed, there have been a number of fixes in the storm-kafka spout
>>>>>> that might account for that problem.  If you need to debug further on 
>>>>>> 0.9.x
>>>>>> you shoulda dump the Kafka consumer offsets and see if the topology is
>>>>>> getting stuck at some specific offsets.  Then examine the data at those
>>>>>> offsets using a console consumer to try to infer why the topology would 
>>>>>> get
>>>>>> stuck.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Erik
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 2:41 PM Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Ajeesh,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry but the version is really outdated, released 3 years ago.
>>>>>>> Would you mind upgrading to recent version, 1.2.1 for example and see 
>>>>>>> how
>>>>>>> it help?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2018년 2월 28일 (수) 오후 9:48, Ajeesh <ajeeshreloa...@gmail.com>님이 작성:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Team,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     We are facing issues in Storm version 0.9.4, Storm application
>>>>>>>> hangs after processing for 3-4 days. We tried to restart the same Storm
>>>>>>>> topology but it will fail within 1-2 minutes by processing around 
>>>>>>>> 15K-16K.
>>>>>>>> If we decrease the max.spout.pending value then it fails by processing 
>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>> few tuples.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     If we start a new topology with new Kafka topic then everything
>>>>>>>> works fine for 3-4 days. Our daily volume will be around 11 million.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Checked the execute latency, it's around 6ms.
>>>>>>>>     Checked worker logs, there's no error/exceptions.
>>>>>>>>     Storm visualization graph shows all nodes in "green" color.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Workflow:
>>>>>>>>         KafkaSpout->Bolt-1->Bolt-2->Bolt-3->Bolt-4.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Storm configurations:
>>>>>>>>         No. of workers: 10
>>>>>>>>         No. of executors: 260
>>>>>>>>         Max Spout Pending: 50
>>>>>>>>         No. of KafkaSpout executors: 10
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     TODO:
>>>>>>>>         1. Wanna take a thread dump
>>>>>>>>          2. Is there anything you require to know more about this
>>>>>>>> issue?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Analyzed worker logs in debug mode:
>>>>>>>>     2018-02-28T05:12:51.462-0500 s.k.PartitionManager [DEBUG]
>>>>>>>> failing at offset=163348 with _pending.size()=3953 pending and
>>>>>>>> _emittedToOffset=168353
>>>>>>>> 2018-02-28T05:12:51.461-0500 s.k.PartitionManager [DEBUG] failing
>>>>>>>> at offset=195116 with _pending.size()=4442 pending and
>>>>>>>> _emittedToOffset=199437
>>>>>>>> 2018-02-28T05:12:51.463-0500 s.k.PartitionManager [DEBUG] failing
>>>>>>>> at offset=194007 with _pending.size()=4442 pending and
>>>>>>>> _emittedToOffset=199437
>>>>>>>> 2018-02-28T05:12:51.463-0500 s.k.PartitionManager [DEBUG] failing
>>>>>>>> at offset=194700 with _pending.size()=4442 pending and
>>>>>>>> _emittedToOffset=199437
>>>>>>>> 2018-02-28T05:12:51.463-0500 s.k.PartitionManager [DEBUG] failing
>>>>>>>> at offset=193891 with _pending.size()=4442 pending and
>>>>>>>> _emittedToOffset=199437
>>>>>>>> 2018-02-28T05:12:51.463-0500 s.k.PartitionManager [DEBUG] failing
>>>>>>>> at offset=194455 with _pending.size()=4442 pending and
>>>>>>>> _emittedToOffset=199437
>>>>>>>> 2018-02-28T05:12:51.463-0500 s.k.PartitionManager [DEBUG] failing
>>>>>>>> at offset=194632 with _pending.size()=4442 pending and
>>>>>>>> _emittedToOffset=199437
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2018-02-28T05:14:05.241-0500 o.a.z.ClientCnxn [DEBUG] Got ping
>>>>>>>> response for sessionid: 0x261d81e8b3d003e after 10ms
>>>>>>>> 2018-02-28T05:14:05.703-0500 o.a.z.ClientCnxn [DEBUG] Got ping
>>>>>>>> response for sessionid: 0x361d81df7a80048 after 0ms
>>>>>>>> 2018-02-28T05:14:05.703-0500 o.a.z.ClientCnxn [DEBUG] Got ping
>>>>>>>> response for sessionid: 0x261d81e8b3d003d after 0ms
>>>>>>>> 2018-02-28T05:14:05.745-0500 o.a.z.ClientCnxn [DEBUG] Got ping
>>>>>>>> response for sessionid: 0x161d81df7a30043 after 2ms
>>>>>>>> 2018-02-28T05:14:05.775-0500 o.a.z.ClientCnxn [DEBUG] Got ping
>>>>>>>> response for sessionid: 0x161d81df7a30045 after 3ms
>>>>>>>> 2018-02-28T05:14:05.849-0500 o.a.z.ClientCnxn [DEBUG] Got ping
>>>>>>>> response for sessionid: 0x361d81df7a80044 after 1ms
>>>>>>>> 2018-02-28T05:14:05.969-0500 o.a.z.ClientCnxn [DEBUG] Got ping
>>>>>>>> response for sessionid: 0x161d81df7a30046 after 0ms
>>>>>>>> 2018-02-28T05:14:07.067-0500 o.a.z.ClientCnxn [DEBUG] Got ping
>>>>>>>> response for sessionid: 0x161d81df7a30041 after 11ms
>>>>>>>> 2018-02-28T05:14:07.131-0500 o.a.z.ClientCnxn [DEBUG] Got ping
>>>>>>>> response for sessionid: 0x261d81e8b3d003c after 0ms
>>>>>>>> 2018-02-28T05:14:07.135-0500 o.a.z.ClientCnxn [DEBUG] Got ping
>>>>>>>> response for sessionid: 0x161d81df7a30042 after 0ms
>>>>>>>> 2018-02-28T05:14:07.140-0500 o.a.z.ClientCnxn [DEBUG] Got ping
>>>>>>>> response for sessionid: 0x261d81e8b3d003b after 0ms
>>>>>>>> 2018-02-28T05:14:07.150-0500 o.a.z.ClientCnxn [DEBUG] Got ping
>>>>>>>> response for sessionid: 0x161d81df7a30044 after 0ms
>>>>>>>> 2018-02-28T05:14:08.319-0500 o.a.z.ClientCnxn [DEBUG] Got ping
>>>>>>>> response for sessionid: 0x361d81df7a8004b after 6ms
>>>>>>>> 2018-02-28T05:14:08.938-0500 o.a.z.ClientCnxn [DEBUG] Got ping
>>>>>>>> response for sessionid: 0x261d81e8b3d0042 after 1ms
>>>>>>>> 2018-02-28T05:14:08.977-0500 o.a.z.ClientCnxn [DEBUG] Got ping
>>>>>>>> response for sessionid: 0x161d81df7a30047 after 10ms
>>>>>>>> 2018-02-28T05:14:08.985-0500 o.a.z.ClientCnxn [DEBUG] Got ping
>>>>>>>> response for sessionid: 0x261d81e8b3d0043 after 6ms
>>>>>>>> 2018-02-28T05:14:08.985-0500 o.a.z.ClientCnxn [DEBUG] Got ping
>>>>>>>> response for sessionid: 0x261d81e8b3d0044 after 7ms
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to