Thanks Daniel. This was helpful. But as you mentioned, I have no clue if I would be needing 0mq or Netty. The project I am re-starting was developed on *storm-0.9.0.1* initially and I would be responsible for establishing required environment setup and making valuable updates while integrating it with other systems. So, if there could be any additional information which could make the choice easier in this context? There seems good support available from online storm communities for 0.9.1-incubating. Does the same could be said for *storm-0.9.0.1?*
Thanks and Regards, Abhishek Roy On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Daniel Cruver <[email protected]> wrote: > The incubation release is newer but they removed the 0mq transport layer. > If you want to use 0mq with the apache incubation there is some > additional work you must do to add it back. I do not work on the Apache > Storm team but it looks like going forward they are dropping support for it. > > > > If you have no clue if you want 0mq or Netty then I would say go with the > Apache Version (0.9.1-incubating). I will leave it to other to give you > more justification why you may want 0mq or not. > > > > Dan > > > > *From:* Abhishek Roy [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Monday, June 09, 2014 12:44 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* storm-0.9.0.1 OR apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating > > > > Hi, > > > > I am quite new to storm and would be using this framework to re-start one > of our previous project. > > I was wondering what would be the best practice to work with in terms of > storm latest version - > > storm-0.9.0.1 > <https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/dj86w8ojecgsam7/storm-0.9.0.1.zip> > * or *apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating > <http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/storm/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating.tar.gz> > > > > I was hoping if I could get logical advice on why one should be preferred > over other at the current situation? > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > Abhishek Roy >
