Thanks for your valuable input Dan. That was helpful in resolving the initial uncertainty.
Thanks and Regards, Abhishek Roy On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Daniel Cruver <[email protected]> wrote: > Before reading the rest of this I do recommend you just use the newer > version. The below and other emails are most likely more information then > you ned to know. > > > > 0mq is GPL that might help you decide if you are making a Commercial or > Government product. Where is Netty is Apache Licensed. I don't believe > the Apache Storm community will want to support 0mq and if you want to > future proof yourself. I am most likely confusing you with details but > for you information the Apache release of Storm defaults to Netty, whereas > the older release defaulted to 0mq. > > > > Storm-0.9.0.1 most likely has more installations just because > 0.9.1-incubating is a newer releases. The only reason why the -incubating > tab is on there is because Storm is making the transition into Apache and > does not signify that this releases is any less stable then the older > version. > > > > When you say integrating with other systems those other systems don't > include Storm correct? If they do then you have to take that into account. > > > > Dan > > > > *From:* Abhishek Roy [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Monday, June 09, 2014 3:04 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: storm-0.9.0.1 OR apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating > > > > Thanks Daniel. This was helpful. > > But as you mentioned, I have no clue if I would be needing 0mq or Netty. > The project I am re-starting was developed on *storm-0.9.0.1* initially and > I would be responsible for establishing required environment setup and > making valuable updates while integrating it with other systems. > > So, if there could be any additional information which could make the > choice easier in this context? There seems good support available from > online storm communities for 0.9.1-incubating. Does the same could be said > for *storm-0.9.0.1?* > > > Thanks and Regards, > > Abhishek Roy > > > > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Daniel Cruver <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The incubation release is newer but they removed the 0mq transport layer. > If you want to use 0mq with the apache incubation there is some > additional work you must do to add it back. I do not work on the Apache > Storm team but it looks like going forward they are dropping support for it. > > > > If you have no clue if you want 0mq or Netty then I would say go with the > Apache Version (0.9.1-incubating). I will leave it to other to give you > more justification why you may want 0mq or not. > > > > Dan > > > > *From:* Abhishek Roy [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Monday, June 09, 2014 12:44 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* storm-0.9.0.1 OR apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating > > > > Hi, > > > > I am quite new to storm and would be using this framework to re-start one > of our previous project. > > I was wondering what would be the best practice to work with in terms of > storm latest version - > > storm-0.9.0.1 > <https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/dj86w8ojecgsam7/storm-0.9.0.1.zip> > * or *apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating > <http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/storm/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating.tar.gz> > > > > I was hoping if I could get logical advice on why one should be preferred > over other at the current situation? > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > Abhishek Roy > > >
