+1 for AppFuse.  

Matt Raible & company really did a good job with it.



________________________________
 From: J. Garcia <jogaco...@gmail.com>
To: Struts Users Mailing List <user@struts.apache.org> 
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: quick WebApp start
 
+1 for AppFuse.
Try the SNAPSHOT version. It features bootstrap-style UI and other goodies.

J.




On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara
<mcucchi...@apache.org>wrote:

> AFAIU AppFuse should be the right choice for your use case.
> Did you try write on AppFuse ML in order to solve your issues?
>
> AFAIK there are no other starting point like AppFuse... another move would
> be to start from S2 blank webapp and add everything you need on top of
> that.
>
> Twitter     :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara
> G+          :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921
> Linkedin    :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara
> VisualizeMe: http://vizualize.me/maurizio.cucchiara?r=maurizio.cucchiara
>
> Maurizio Cucchiara
>
>
> On 11 November 2012 11:22, Giovanni Azua <brave...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > It is a while I haven't seen Struts 2 and would like to quickly build a
> > simple WebApp, I need only very basic functionality. Is there a quick
> start
> > sample WebApp I could build upon? While my needs are very basic i.e.
> > authentication, user registration etc I would like to have a consistent
> > design look and feel and I remember we had at least two choices for this:
> > Tiles or Sitemesh and many Ajax frameworks to choose from. Is there a
> quick
> > start WebApp ready for customization where these choices have been made
> to
> > sensible defaults e.g. simply take Sitemesh for the L&F.
> >
> >
> >
> > I have been meantime trying to use AppFuse and bumped into some
> > installation
> > issues. So far AppFuse is the closest match to what I am looking for
> except
> > that I don't prefer code generators but reusable components instead.
> >
> >
> >
> > Many TIA,
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Giovanni
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to