Am I the only one that finds at least some humor in one sentence that includes both "Struts 1" and the word "urgent"? :-)
-Dale PS: I would guess, based on transitive dependencies, if nothing else, that anything still based upon struts1 is rife with vulnerabilities. I agree it probably should be decommissioned, if just to eliminate the risks resulting from those vulnerabilities. I would also look at this as an opportunity to re-envision the business solution and build a modern, scalable replacement, perhaps that provides even more capabilities to its users. Perhaps that includes more modern versions of Struts, perhaps not. This is a chance to shed legacy technical debt and leverage modern tools to both simplify the implementation and reduce operational costs. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
