Here, here, Rick,
Not to mention that you have no guarantees as to which JRE the client machines may have installed. Java on the client is an exceptionally poor idea unless you have very explicit control over the machines it is to be deployed to.
Regards,
Eddie
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick Reumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 10:28 PM
Subject: Re: OT Re: Back Button Woes!!!!
Vic Cekvenich wrote the following on 10/11/2004 7:34 PM:"Walk toward the light" http://theserverside.com/articles/article.tss?l=RiA
Vic, I briefly read over the article. I agree that we'll see more and more rich clients, but one of the problems is people aren't going to want to always install stuff on their desktop in order to run an application - so I wouldn't go so far as to say HTML will be "dead." Flash is nice because it runs almost seemlessly within the browser since the plugin is so easy to install. I'm not convinced, yet, that something like Java Desktop will be that ubiquitous that it will replace the likes of the browser as a client.
--
Rick
--- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0442-0, 10/11/2004 Tested on: 10/11/2004 10:31:40 PM avast! - copyright (c) 2000-2004 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
