Frankly, I think that this thread was, until the sardonic and biting
interjection about "very poor etiquette", one of the better ones I've
seen recently.  It is interesting that anyone could defend this
objection.  (I should say that Hubert's offering is not seen as a
"defense" but as informative.)

Jack


On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:22:49 -0500, Erik Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> Jim Barrows wrote:
> 
> >On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:59:59 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Sorry about posting code to the list if that is poor etiquette.  I didn't
> >>know of that one.  What's the reason for it?  My code wasn't too lengthy
> >>and the email can easily be deleted by those that don't care.  I just
> >>thought some other newbies (not unlike myself) might find it useful or
> >>thought provoking.  Again, if this is against the rules of the list, I am
> >>sorry.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Don't worry about it.  It's not really, as far as I know anyway.  Some
> >people are just cranky.  Putting hte code where it can be searched by
> >folks is a good thing.
> >
> >
> 
> While I appreciate the points that Craig made (see other recent post)
> about posting copyrighted code and respecting bandwidth, I almost wrote
> a post jut to thank all of you for contributing to this thread, and I
> agree with Jim on this point. I read through all the code in this thread
> and saved it to look at it later. I will abide by the rules of the list
> (assuming I know and understand them of course), but if I have a vote, I
> like to compare code and am always looking for a "rounder wheel"! Maybe
> the Wiki is the best place, but I'm just not in the Wiki "habit".
> Perhaps I should give it a try. Maybe there should be a user (help) list
> for pure user issues (this list), a dev list for those developing Struts
> and related (the dev list), and a third (new) list for discussing
> development strategies related to Struts? Just thinking out loud. I
> think it is somewhat logical to think that the list of lists might grow
> as the product evolves . . .
> 
> Erik
> 
> >
> >
> >>Eddie Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>01/20/2005 11:59 PM
> >>Please respond to "Struts Users Mailing List"
> >>
> >>
> >>        To:     Struts Users Mailing List <user@struts.apache.org>, Dakota 
> >> Jack
> >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>        cc:
> >>        Subject:        Re: Session Strategy (here's a filter)
> >>
> >>... it is a filter ... notice how it says "implements Filter".  The
> >>mapping in web.xml is a dead giveaway too.
> >>
> >>I'd love to know how it detects session timeouts though.  Far as I can
> >>tell it will tell people who have yet to have a session created that
> >>they've timed out.  ... first trip around the block they shouldn't see
> >>that message.  The only way I can think of detecting timeout, as I
> >>mentioned in an earlier post sometime back, is to put a marker of some
> >>kind out (a session cookie) when a person logs in.  You could then
> >>tell, by absence of a session and presence of the marker, that the
> >>session timed out.
> >>
> >>... I'd love to see a simpler approach (not that what I suggest is
> >>complex).  I don't personally believe you can do it with fewer things
> >>than I've mentioned here.
> >>
> >>... and please *don't* post code!  It's very poor etiquette.  If
> >>someone solicits something from you, send it to them and them alone -
> >>not the list (unless explicitly asked to do so, and then limit what
> >>you post to only relevant pieces of files).
> >>
> >>On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:43:32 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>I was interested, again, in a filter.
> >>>
> >>>Jack
> >>>
> >>>On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:41:32 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Dakota Jack wrote:
> >>>>I was looking for a filter that detected sessions that had expired and
> >>>>rerouted the request to a login or other appropriate page.
> >>>>
> >>>>--------------------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>>That's what this does, specifically the following section of code:
> >>>>
> >>>>Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>01/20/2005 11:07 AM
> >>>>
> >>>>I was looking for a filter that detected sessions that had expired and
> >>>>rerouted the request to a login or other appropriate page.
> >>>>
> >>>>Jack
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>--
> >>Eddie Bush
> >>
> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


-- 
------------------------------

"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."

~Dakota Jack~

"You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep."

~Native Proverb~

"Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary for eagles to be crows."

~Hunkesni (Sitting Bull), Hunkpapa Sioux~

-----------------------------------------------

"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based
on this message or any information herein. If you have received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation."

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to