Because you get yelled at when you say that and some people cannot take being yelled at. Expect Craig, Ted, or someone to say the standard thing soon on this tread. I know I am doing my part. LOL ///;-)
Jack On Apr 1, 2005 11:45 AM, Benedict, Paul C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dave, > > Unless I am wrong (I may be!), I think the implicit point is not to use > Struts for future projects. Since JSF provides backing beans, validation, > heavy user interface controls (all Struts equivalents), I can see why > someone would promote JSF over Struts..... > > But why? If the only reason is "it is better because it is a Sun standard", > I don't buy into it. I am not saying that is the only reason, but webapps > are webapps and I don't think a Swing-like user interface all that really > matters -- even with AJAX support -- unless your goal is to build Swing-like > user interfaces. And since I can turn JavaScript off in Mozilla, I think > most custom JSF components would become non-functional if I did. (I like to > not use JavaScript where possible.) > > Anyway, how come no one is saying that the future is Struts 1.3 or 1.4? Why > all the hoopla about the future IS JSF? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Newton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 2:31 PM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: Is It Possible to Code Using Struts and JSF at the Same Time? > > Erik Weber wrote: > > > I agree. I thought, Craig, that you until recently were interested in > > Struts and JSF coexisting, meaning that both would grow, even if you > > were no longer the active leader of Struts. > > I don't think anybody said anything about not using Struts; we were > discussing the Struts tags, HTML in particular. > > Why is everybody opposed to JSF? I don't know a whole lot about it and > am at a point where I need to think about future development needs. > > Dave > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains > information of Merck & Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, New > Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates (which may be known outside the > United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp & Dohme or MSD and in Japan, as > Banyu) that may be confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity > named on this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have > received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail > and then delete it from your system. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
