Benedict, Paul C wrote:

Unless I am wrong (I may be!), I think the implicit point is not to use
Struts for future projects. Since JSF provides backing beans, validation,
heavy user interface controls (all Struts equivalents), I can see why
someone would promote JSF over Struts.....


Ooo, hrm. All he really said was that the HTML tags are legacy; obviously Struts development marches on.

Having fought with the Struts tags and the difficulty in adding functionality to them without just taking the source and making them my own, I'd be delighted to use something different that interacted better with, say, custom request processors, etc.

But why? If the only reason is "it is better because it is a Sun standard",
I don't buy into it.

Well, if that was the only reason I wouldn't buy into it either :) Heck, I'm not sold on Java at all, after all these years.

Anyway, how come no one is saying that the future is Struts 1.3 or 1.4? Why
all the hoopla about the future IS JSF?


Dunno.

I still think lisp-backed flash-fronted sites are the wave of the future, but nobody ever listens to me :D

Dave



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to