<snip> If there is a different rule on advocating Shale-Struts as Struts.next for Craig, that is understandable.
</snip> But where in his post did he say that Shale-Struts was Struts.next? All he said was that the way the rest of the world is going (and imho HAS been going) with a variety of view techniques becoming available, that an html only option is probably not a viable alternative in the future. (my paraphrasing/translation) Al --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
