On 6/8/05, Hubert Rabago <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In a matter of a few minutes, I suddenly got three offline messages
> with follow up questions.  I usually don't mind, though each time I
> reply to such messages, I include the text below.  In this case, I
> thought I'd share these thoughts with the rest of the list.

Your essay confirms that people, especially programmers, don't read.
Isn't most of this is in the mailing list rules? I would like to add
something too. I hate emails, especally short ones, with huge
boilerplate content like this:

=== cut here ===
This e mail is from ...

The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential to the
intended recipient. They may not be disclosed to or used by or copied
in any way by anyone other than the intended recipient. If this email
is received in error, please contact ... quoting the name of the
sender and the email address to which it has been sent and then delete
it.

Please note that neither ... nor the sender accept any responsibility
for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan or otherwise check
this email and any attachments.

... is a ... registered in ... which provides services from offices in
... .  A list of members is open for inspection at its registered
office and principal place of business ... .  Partner denotes member
of a limited liability partnership.

For further information, please refer to ....
=== cut here ===

One who came up with this kind of safe harbor statements, is my
personal enemy. Entropy cannot be reduced, but in our efforts to keep
it from growing ;)

Michael.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to