I agree w/ Dakota on this. Using a "lines of code" metric to measure cost is about as valid as saying "Well, gee, M$'s stock prices are way higher than Sun's, so we should use .net!" (Which, incidentally was the approach used where I work. Scary.)
This thread is retarded. The intent is to decide which is better: .net, or Java/j2ee/JSF. Bottom line: THEY ALL SUCK. Period. If any of these is the pinnacle of human accomplishment, we are truly screwed. Not only that, but the comparison is totally pointless. Without some context, it is impossible to say which is better FOR YOUR NEEDS. The question is like "Which is better: Pork or Chicken?" I am adding an auto-delete filter on this thread...what a waste of brain cells and bandwidth. Larry On 7/2/05, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, I don't. This is a really superficial analysis. > > On 7/1/05, John Henry Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > in any cases of programming, more lines and more classes means > > more work and more money. Don't you agree? > > > > Jack H. Xu > > Technology columnist and editor --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
