J. you don't even understand "your" own code. How can you make a decision?
On 7/22/05, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/22/05, Rick Reumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I only see these current solutions having merit if you are *required* to > > not have any javascript. For me, this will never be a requirement and I > > doubt it will ever be. Since I can use javascript it's so easy for me to > > just add > > > > onclick="myForm.dispatch.value='someDispatchMethod'" > > > > You can use this kind of code with almost anything (with images just > > also add myForm.submit()). Easy to use and no need to figuure out how > > yet another flavor of SomeonesNewAndImprovedAction works. > > If something can work without Javascript and is as simple as a > solution with Javascript, which one would you choose? Designing forms > in HTML editor is simpler too, just drop a button and set name/value, > no Javascript to wire. > > This is a rather generic solution, proposed to be included into Struts > core, not a Javascript hack. Of course, in the end we can write > everything as a servlet, but I thought that the whole purpose of web > frameworks was to provide standard solutions for common problems. > > We can crawl back to our dark corners and use our own flawors of > actions and scripts, watching the world changing. > > Michael. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
