+1 for that answer.

Pedro Salgado

On 27/07/2005 08:15, "Tamas Szabo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I wouldn't bet on PHP being more popular than Java webapps.
> 
> I think that there will be more smaller Java webapps if there were much
> support for them at web hosting companies.
> I know several cases when Java webapp programmers, had to use PHP to
> make some smaller webapps for someone because most web hosting companies
> offer PHP support but they have no
> Java webcontainers installed.
> 
> Tamas
> 
> 
> 
> Yan Hu wrote:
> 
>> Xu:
>> One of the reasons why you see a lot of PHP apps is that there are always a
>> lot more small apps
>> than large scale ones. I can not imagin you program a large scale site using
>> PHP. If you are an OO
>> guy, I could hardly imagin you even would like PHP(mixing all server side
>> code with html code).
>> There are a lot of java intranet applications you will never be able to
>> access. PHP has its niche
>> in the small app domain. It is fine. But it will never be at the same level
>> as Java. I do not
>> understand why you think PHP is more popular than Java. Let me ask you one
>> simple question. Why
>> are there so many more java jobs than PHP jobs? Anyone will tell you it is
>> because there is a lot
>> more demand for java. So you get the idea. With the advent of JSF, Java will
>> be even sexier. I
>> have long wished for something like asp.net code behind in C#. Now we have
>> JSF code behind in
>> Java. If asp.net can be a big success, why can't JSF?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
>> 
>>  
>> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to