I didn't mean to imply struts is buggy;-). But fixes seem to get a better response from the architect than enhancements.
I'm about done with a selected list of changes/enhancements since 1.1. Would you mind looking it over and telling me what you think? Thanks again, Mariano P.S. My list came from the release notes. -----Original Message----- From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 5:47 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: Struts 1.2 From: "Hernandez, Mariano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Two quick question guys. I'm trying to type up reasons as to why we should > upgrade from 1.1 to 1.2 (specifically 1.2.7). It seems to me that the bulk > of the fixes/enhancements have been in client/server side validation and > tiles. I've got some other stuff like errorClass etc in html tags, action > message support in actions, lazy validator form included too. Can you guys > think of anything else I can throw in? Really major bugs that have been > fixed since 1.1 would be ideal. This seems to imply that there _were_ really major bugs in 1.1. ;) The release notes since 1.1 are on these two pages: http://struts.apache.org/userGuide/release-notes-1.2.4.html http://struts.apache.org/userGuide/release-notes-1.2.7.html > Also, I was I would like to know the amount of support available here for > 1.1 questions vs. 1.2. Is it generally frowned upon to ask 1.1 questions > or is that kosher? Definitely not frowned on-- you're welcome to ask, but you take your chances as to whether you'll get a quick answer. I would say support for 1.1 is not going to be great, but it all depends on who's subscribed to the list on any given day. -- Wendy Smoak --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
