>From: Richard Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Ryan Wynn wrote: > > I would recommend that the ticket on shale bugzilla be closed in favor > > of the ticket on myfaces jira ticket > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-806 > > > > because I think it was agreed that this file would reside inside > > tomahawk.jar instead of within shale. > > > > The concensus on the shale ticket > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37024 was that any > > view technology that supports clay would provide it's own config file. > > > > In addition to being closed the shale ticket should probably reference > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-806 > > > I agree (for what it's worth). > > The last note on that issue for MyFaces was that Sean was going to ask > Gary to take a look at the file and if he got the thumbs up that he'd > commit it. So, what's the word Gary? >
Well, I must have missed that thread :-) I have not had a chance to test all of the tomahawk components. It sounds like Ryan Wynn has allot of coverage here and would have the best config file. If we can't establish that relationship with myfaces, I would like to see Shale bring it in. It sounds like we have some people interested in keeping it current. I think that even config templates that use symbols might be something worth cataloging. Gary > Maybe someone should put up a page showing examples of the usage of the > components like at http://www.irian.at/myfaces/home.jsf. I might be > able to get something started but I'm not sure of exactly how to do them > all in Clay (mostly I'm not sure how to use the validators and some > other things in Clay, but it would probably be a good learning > experience). > > Rich > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
