On 3/14/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When you contribute, and when you accept a position as a leader in the > community, as any Struts committer does for instance, you accept a > certain degree of responsibility to the community.
"For no particular reason I just kept on going. I ran clear to the ocean. And when I got there, I figured, since I'd gone this far, I might as well turn around, just keep on going. When I got to another ocean, I figured, since I'd gone this far, I might as well just turn back, keep right on going." - Sir, why are you running? - Why are you running? - Are you doing this for world peace? - Are you doing this for women's right? - Or for the environment? - Or for animals? - Or for nuclear arms? "They just couldn't believe that somebody would do all that running for no particular reason. I just felt like running." "I had a lot of company. My Momma always said you got to put the past behind you before you can move on. And I think that's what my running was all about. I had run for three years, two months, fourteen days, and sixteen hours." > No, for me, the responsibility begins when you decide you want to > contribute, and it grows as you become more of a contributor and > therefor more of a leader in the community. This is my basic premise. > This also would seem to jive with basic sociological communal theory I am finished with communal theories, had enough of them in the country where I came from. Not my shot of vodka. I cannot care less about my neighbours as long as they keep quiet from 23:00 till 7:00. Anything else - get high, fuck your labrador or burn down the house - I don't care. Michael J. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
