Jonathan Revusky wrote:
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
Welcome Jonathan! Better late than never :)
Jonathan Revusky wrote:
Well, to put it another way, if I were assigned the task of
evaluating different things in this space, and Struts was one of
them, it is very unlikely that I would settle on it. I would almost
certainly end up opting for a non-schizophrenic alternative.
I don't know how other people see things. This is just my honest
reaction. I have no vested interest in this.
I think it is fair to say that some people see no problem, others see
a potentially big problem. Aside from that, I'm not sure any
conclusion can be drawn :)
Sorry, in the part below I was speed-reading and thought you said that
no conclusion could be drawn about the previous commit privileges issue.
I take back what I say below. Whether the Action/Shale cohabitation is
a good idea or not is hard to verify empirically, so I agree with your
comment above.
JR
Well, that's not true, Frank. A conclusion can be drawn since it's an
empirically resolvable question. You can replicate (roughly) the same
experiment enough times to draw a pretty definitive conclusion. I don't
say my own experience is enough to be definitive. But so far, my
experience suggests that the fears you express about letting people
commit code are not very well founded. In particular, the malice issue
is pretty much an ersatz problem, I think. Also, that people start
committing oodles of low quality code all of a sudden doesn't seem to
happen either.
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project http://freemarker.org/
FreeMarker group blog, http://freemarker.blogspot.com/
Regards,
Jonathan Revusky
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
