It has been taken off track by your backers, Craig. There were some questions raised about why Struts failed and how it might be good to look at how this list behaves. This is the only forum for that discussion. You get people that are wonderfully happy with the list that take that concern down nasty paths. Talk to them. But, the conversation should not be stiffled because people cannot accept criticism. Your personal lack of any sort of response, given that you are a principal architect of the failure in question is disappointing. To now attempt to stiffle any conversation of the situation you have failed to address may well be one of the main reasons for the failure people are trying to analyze. Is analysis of failure not a good idea here?
On 3/25/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/25/06, Jonathan Revusky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Mark Lowe wrote: > > > Look.. You've been invited to post your thoughts about the way that > > > apache do stuff, to a more appropiate audience than a bunch of > > > half-wit struts users like me.. > > > > Mark, I was involved in a conversation with various people. It so > > happens that the conversation developed here. > > > No matter where the conversation developed, it has gone in directions that > are off topic on this list. Please feel free to continue the > conversation, > but do it somewhere else. > > Craig > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~
